Professor Dusty Harrington
You do not have access to this case. Please return to the Resources page to select another case. If you have any questions, please contact Bethany Smith at bethany@dprep.com.
Dr. Dusty Harrington is an associate professor of political science known for his sharp intellect, moral conviction, and provocative classroom style. His courses challenge students to examine systems of power, and his lectures often connect theory to current global events. Over time, his discussions have become more intense, reflecting his growing frustration with what he views as moral decay and institutional complacency. Students describe Dusty as both inspiring and intimidating. Some praise his ability to provoke thought and spark lively debate, while others report feeling uncomfortable with his tone or perspective. His recent focus on the Gaza conflict has drawn complaints from students and attention from administrators, who are concerned that his teaching has shifted from inquiry toward advocacy. Dusty sees this scrutiny as evidence that higher education has lost its courage to confront difficult truths. Outside the classroom, Dusty is active online, posting commentary that blends political analysis with moral outrage. He writes passionately about academic freedom, corruption in higher education, and the moral failure of silence in times of crisis. Colleagues have begun to express concern about his well-being and judgment, noting that his language and tone have grown darker and more urgent. To Dusty, these reactions only confirm that he is standing alone in defense of integrity and truth.
Donor flags Dusty’s public profile on a discussion board criticizing universities as “laundering conscience” and having “blood on their hands,” raising reputational concerns.
Dusty emails again after no response, suggesting the colleague may have been advised not to engage; forwarded to the Dean for awareness.
Mercer forwards Dusty’s writing sample and invitation to meet for coffee or a drink, asking for guidance after finding the message unusual.
Message from Dusty to a colleague expressing disillusionment with academia and proposing collaboration on an anti-establishment essay; forwarded to the Dean out of concern.
Dusty writes directly to the President about “moral and intellectual collapse,” asserting that his references to Gaza were censored and framing it as an academic freedom issue.
LeClair forwards Dusty’s “Moral Bankruptcy of the Modern University” draft, noting its shift in tone and expressing concern about its content.
Summary of concerns from students and colleagues about Dusty, recommending a preliminary meeting with HR and University Counsel.
Dean documents a meeting with Dusty and Department Chair Ellsworth about classroom climate, with a follow-up meeting planned.
Student Jordan Ellis reports that Dusty’s class feels like a political rally, citing repeated references to Gaza and “institutional cowardice.”
Institutional report showing strong overall ratings, with early notes about prolonged political commentary and a confrontational classroom tone.
